Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:50:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8? Message-ID: <4A2590A6.2010109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090602204638.GC4425@lonesome.com> References: <3B3FEBB417C04B77AED8998347C99585@multiplay.co.uk> <03083008@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <4A1D7320.2030000@FreeBSD.org> <20090527191746.GA8089@lonesome.com> <67308765@bb.ipt.ru> <20090602204638.GC4425@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: >>>> Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad thing. :) >>> s/BROKEN/IGNORE/ >> Just wonder, can/should it be implemented automagically via >> the repocopy script? > > I have no opinion, but will note that as long as you don't connect > the ports to the category Makefile, you don't need to worry about > things like this :-) The problem that I responded to was users who surf into those directories that expect useful things to happen. That problem isn't fixed by not hooking them up. If it's easy to add this feature to the repocopy script then I would suggest it be done. Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A2590A6.2010109>