Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:02:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Pechter <pechter@lakewood.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: dk+@ua.net, grog@lemis.com, mike@smith.net.au, pechter@lakewood.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <199710061102.HAA01674@i4got.lakewood.com> In-Reply-To: <2369.876125643@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Oct 6, 97 01:14:03 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Who can decide on this? Is there a conspiracy behind it? ;-) > > Given that I don't particularly *care* about UUCP in the first place, > I really don't mind what goes into 2.2.5 as far as this is concerned. > > Anyone masochistic enough to still use UUCP in this day and age is > also capable of fixing any breakage that may occur, I think. Go for it. ;) > > Jordan > Masochistic 8-) UUCP is much easier to configure than, say gated.conf! Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bill Pechter | 17 Meredith Drive Tinton Falls, NJ 07724 | 908-389-3592 pechter@lakewood.com | Save computing history, give an old geek old hardware. This msg brought to you by the letters PDP and the number 11.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710061102.HAA01674>