Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 15:05:09 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Gavin Cameron <gavin@itworks.com.au> Cc: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@uol.com.br>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/22269: qmail installation should also modify /etc/make.conf Message-ID: <20001028150509.A16293@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010251003410.98087-100000@maybe.itworks.com.au>; from gavin@itworks.com.au on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 10:07:05AM %2B1100 References: <20001024193002.A2701@Fedaykin.here> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010251003410.98087-100000@maybe.itworks.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed 2000-10-25 (10:07), Gavin Cameron wrote: > For those that never do a build world the parameter will never come into > play. For those that do a build world I'm sure that they don't want their > qmail installation corrupted or overwritten. > > Both of those points seem to say that putting the entry into > /etc/make.conf is a good thing. No. If you use mailwrapper, like you're supposed to, then it won't corrupt anything. If you want to bypass mailwrapper, then that's your choice, and then _you_ can put "NO_MAILWRAPPER" in /etc/make.conf. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001028150509.A16293>