From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jun  6 12:41:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29542
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ceres.brunel.ac.uk (pp@ceres.brunel.ac.uk [134.83.176.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA29537;
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 12:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by ceres.brunel.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 20:39:22 +0100
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
          by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id UAA27522;
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 20:34:30 +0100 (BST)
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: miscfs/devfs
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 20:34:28 +0100
Message-ID: <27520.834089668@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Is devfs meant to have been tagged onto the 2.1 branch? I just noticed
that it appeared in my checkout on freefall and the tags are there for
both 2.0.5 and 2.1! Umm?!?

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info