Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:50:20 -0400
From:      "Michael W . Lucas" <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@freebsd.org>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
Message-ID:  <20030611095020.B19916@blackhelicopters.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030611083344.GA35406@HAL9000.homeunix.com>; from das@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:33:44AM -0700
References:  <200306110036.h5B0aOkL049132@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030611083344.GA35406@HAL9000.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:33:44AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > mwlucas     2003/06/10 17:36:24 PDT
> > 
> >   FreeBSD doc repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml 
> >   Log:
> >   Any FAQ that begins with "I just upgraded to 2.0.5" deserves to be
> >   exterminated with extraordinary prejudice.
> 
> Thank you!  I'm glad someone finally took the initiative to clean
> the cruft from our FAQ!

You're welcome.

>  (I would have suggested that we move the
> useful information to the Handbook and eliminate the FAQ.)

You and many other people.  There's much discussion about this in the
archives.

Short answer:

The FAQ and the Handbook have different goals.  The FAQ is supposed to
be brief and q&a oriented.  Instead, it's full of brief tutorials that
need to be integrated into the Handbook.

Stuff like "why did I upgrade to -stable and get -rc?" belongs in the
FAQ.

==ml

-- 
Michael Lucas		mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org
http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

           Absolute OpenBSD:   http://www.AbsoluteOpenBSD.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030611095020.B19916>