Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:54:41 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables Message-ID: <37B86C81.10308359@scc.nl> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9908161900230.34377-100000@freja.webgiro.com> <199908161709.KAA10454@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree > :for modules (as was already discussed several times..) > > Yes, this is very true. But I think we are fooling ourselves if we > believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future. > Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-) I don't think we'll do ourselves a favor if we allow the Linuxulator to be compiled into the kernel again. To much depends on it to be a module. I write down "modules.linux" as an option (and a good one too, IMHO). -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37B86C81.10308359>