Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:57:01 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: a proposed callout API 
Message-ID:  <1299.1164923821@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:52:22 %2B0100." <ekmr76$23g$1@sea.gmane.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <ekmr76$23g$1@sea.gmane.org>, Ivan Voras writes:

>No trying to take sides here, but for us willing to learn here, what
>exactly are the problems in Matt Dillon's suggestions? From a novice's
>POV, having per-cpu queues looks (emphasis: looks) very scalable and
>performant.

I'm not going to dissect Matts emails because that will just lead 
to a long an pointless flamewar.

Most of Matts emails focus on the specifics of implementation whereas
I have repeatedly stressed that my focus is on defining a good API
for programmers to use which will allow us to isolate the implemetation
so we can experiment with different strategies.

I will work with John to write up our spec and we will publish that
along with the reasoning soon.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299.1164923821>