Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:20:14 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: OpenCVS Message-ID: <20041207222014.GA47020@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes=20 > any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another=20 > implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like= =20 > SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to=20 > p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide=20 > here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only=20 > be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold=20 > over what's currently available now. unsubscribe --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtiyeWry0BWjoQKURAkj2AKCbiIJ7ZSmAt7jlYaHNgzhSjCeIkACeNBIQ Bz9sh7eeFx8Rnj75Rv//26s= =2tsJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041207222014.GA47020>