Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:01:17 +0200 From: Adriaan de Groot <groot@kde.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? Message-ID: <200506140001.18107.groot@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456EA37@VIP10-WIN2K> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456EA37@VIP10-WIN2K>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 13 June 2005 15:27, you wrote: > > People should report what they know to work. We should > > probably get rid of the "functional" and "fully > > functional"... OR define what "fully functional" > > means. This was the important bit of my message: if "fully functional" means "the bits I care about worked" then there's just not much point in putting it up there. > The reason SATA was untested was that I found there were > issues getting RAID to raid to work on the Sil chips, just > from reading this list. Oh, so did I. This was one of the few times I've received a new box and thought "oh, crap", since I knew it just wasn't going to work, not for the purposes I have for it. Well, modulo the amount of effort I wanted to put into it. (Gosh, but Scott has an nForce4 board working "just fine", so maybe 6-CURRENT _is_ the way to go.) -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506140001.18107.groot>