From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 06:30:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F49FBD6; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFECFE3; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA17885; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:29:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Xg6Tf-0000BA-EW; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:29:59 +0300 Message-ID: <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:29:23 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: latest freebsd:11:x86:64 repo and ruby 1.9 -> 2.0 References: <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org> <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:30:02 -0000 On 20/10/2014 01:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> $ pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD >>> repository is up-to-date. Updating poudriere repository catalogue... >>> poudriere repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (24 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done >>> (1 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The >>> following 24 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): >> >> First, a minor nit: of 0 checked? >> >>> Installed packages to be REMOVED: ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1 porttools-1.02 >>> newfile-1.0.14_4 hub-1.12.2 libchk-1.10.3 zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2 >> >> Then the real problem, I do not want these packages to be removed except >> for ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1. In other words, I want to keep using >> zfs-snapshot-mgmt, libchk, hub and porttools. What should I do? > > Just accept the upgrade and reinstall them they are there. we need to > improve the solver to prevent that. OK. This should work for me this time, but in general we can see how annoying this could be if dozens of packages would be affected. -- Andriy Gapon