Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:37:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Gary Clark II <gclarkii@main.gbdata.com> To: jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber) Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LaTeX support Message-ID: <199704211937.OAA11670@main.gbdata.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970421142310.6598e-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> from John Fieber at "Apr 21, 97 02:32:24 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Fieber wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Gary Clark II wrote: > > > Maybe, since LaTeX is the best way to get a decent hardcopy of the sources. > > If this is taken out, then we need to get the groff versions up to snuff > > (page numbers and such). > > Okay, I'll bite. What is wrong with the groff version? > > (Note: I'm talking about FreeBSD 2.2 and later, not 2.1 for which > your statement is definately true.) Ok, it may have been fixed up since I last took a poke at it, but I do remember that the groff versions did not have page numbers and have the ablitity to do left page/right page with out alot of hacking of the groff source file. The LaTeX version, it is a snap to get dual sided copy. > > -john > Gary -- Gary Clark II (N5VMF) | I speak only for myself and "maybe" my company gclarkii@GBData.COM | Member of the FreeBSD Doc Team Providing Internet and ISP startups - http://WWW.GBData.com for information FreeBSD FAQ at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/docs/FAQ.latin1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704211937.OAA11670>