From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 19:55:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E4016A4D0 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-aubervilliers.netaktiv.com (soyouz.netaktiv.com [80.67.170.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D1443D2E for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:55:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stephane@laperouse.internatif.org) Received: by mail-aubervilliers.netaktiv.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id CB30523D0A; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:55:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by fetiche.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58D8B9AD0; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:09:45 +0430 (AFT) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:09:45 +0430 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: Simon Barner Message-ID: <20031210163945.GB800@fetiche.sources.org> References: <012701c3bde4$4acf2b30$019c9752@xp> <20031209013027.GC1099@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <03da01c3be90$032636f0$019c9752@xp> <20031210011904.GB2145@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210011904.GB2145@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Transport: UUCP rules X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE i386 cc: Vahric MUHTARYAN cc: FreeBSD questions List Subject: Re: Why userland , basesystem and Kernel are together?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:55:11 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:19:04AM +0100, Simon Barner wrote a message of 101 lines which said: > If you have a look at all this, you will easily understand why there > aren't multiple FreeBSD distributions (like in the Linux world): > The FreeBSD Project provides more than a kernel - it also maintains > the base system and almost 10000 ported third-party applications (the > so-called ports collection). You are comparing apples and oranges. Linux is a kernel, not an operating system. "Distributions" is a specially ill-choosen word in the Linux world. There are several operating systems, Debian, RedHat, Mandrake, which only have in common to use the Linux kernel. Forget the word "distributions" which seems to imply that an operating system is defined by its kernel. And there are several operating systems based on a BSD kernel, too: FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, there is even now a Debian/BSD which uses a NetBSD kernel instead of Linux.