Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:01:48 -0400
From:      Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=C3=B6m=22?= <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
Message-ID:  <5E06FE1D432A00CE74B1DA1A@mac-pro.magehandbook.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E22DFE9.7050007@pathscale.com>
References:  <20110717071059.25971662@scorpio> <CAGwOe2YpUXgFx1f_1UWHNt4S=p=X1Soa348KWR9BTrjxF0bAwA@mail.gmail.com> <4E22DFE9.7050007@pathscale.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
--As of July 17, 2011 8:13:13 PM +0700, "C. Bergstr=C3=B6m" is alleged to =
have=20
said:

> 1) Why care about *BSD as a desktop?
> 2) Why care about *BSD as a workstation? (Which I see as a next level in
> stability/usability beyond a toy "desktop")

--As for the rest, it is mine.

Because it is easier to get your admins to support a server if they can=20
have a working development desktop that matches the server's OS and config. =

(Apart from their interface and development software, which would only be=20
on the dev box.)

Just a thought.  ;)

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E06FE1D432A00CE74B1DA1A>