From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 16:21:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A14C16A4CE for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:21:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.alexdupre.com (host245-49.pool8288.interbusiness.it [82.88.49.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C4943D1D for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:21:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (thunder.alexdupre.com [192.168.0.101]) i1G0LGXN092133; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:21:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <40300CFC.5080900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:21:16 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David.E.Tweten@nasa.gov References: <5820.1076890106@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: <5820.1076890106@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PostScript of articles/checkpoint Broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:21:20 -0000 Dave Tweten wrote: > I just commented it out of /etc/make.conf and re-ran the command. > Previously, that command went into its infinite loop almost immediately > (as shown in my first message). It is now happily processing the FreeBSD > documentation into compressed PostScript. Well, it sounds good, isn't it? :) > So should I remove the configuration line permanently? I'm sure I only > put it into /etc/make.conf on someone's advice to make the FreeBSD > documentation go. I don't otherwise use Jade. Yes, you put it there for the docproj port...a recent commit broke your setup. I'm working for the best solution to adopt, in the meanwhile you can safely remove that row from your make.conf (and maybe deinstall docproj metaport and install docproj-jadetex one to obtain the same result even with portupgrade). -- Alex Dupre