From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Oct 30 18:23:29 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA18364
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:23:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA18355;
          Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-08.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.40]) by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA28909; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:22:16 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.2/8.6.9) id SAA01266; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199610310221.SAA01266@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: max@wide.ad.jp
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199610191712.CAA04347@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> (message from Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= on Sun, 20 Oct 1996 02:12:06 +0900)
Subject: Re: Do we still need ports/net/sup?
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Is there any reason why we still have ports/net/sup?  I think it
 * doesn't have to be in the ports collection since it's already
 * installed in /usr/sbin on standard systems.

I think you are quite right, in fact I brought it up to Justin Gibbs
and he said "Hmmm.  I'd rather see it get removed from the main source
tree actually."

While that may be better, it is in /usr/src currently and I don't
recally any discussion about deleting it.  So I will remove it from
the ports tree in a few days if noone objects.

Satoshi