Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:17:59 -0500 From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@gmail.com> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: Re: FYI: v4l-linuxulator support in FreeBSD-current now Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Ek4-C5LJtoxo7bTHr8Zn=_QBJfJeXE5Ybk2g-@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110111183937.GA36761@triton8.kn-bremen.de> References: <20091204223126.00005392@unknown> <201001081650.14189.hselasky@c2i.net> <20100108114130.1cfe88c5@shibato.opal.com> <201101110947.46399.hselasky@c2i.net> <20110111092609.7bf82016@shibato.opal.com> <20110111183937.GA36761@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrot= e: > =A0And FE_[GS]ET_PROPERTY I think are part of the `new' dvb api that > was introduced when adding support for dvb-s2, which would also > explain why the naive patch appeared to work: =A0whatever app(s) were > used to test it probably were just still using the `old' dvb api. > (Well, or the tests were only done on i386. :) Test was done with just azap, dvbtraffic, and test_dvr on amd64.. Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=Ek4-C5LJtoxo7bTHr8Zn=_QBJfJeXE5Ybk2g->