Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Aug 2018 10:32:38 +0200
From:      Ali Abdallah <aliovx@gmail.com>
To:        Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: drm / drm2 removal in 12
Message-ID:  <CAO3OKx8-bWfdQU1XRxai6uK%2BpyfG3jD5SkSW9Yu_FK8LySuPOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPrugNqV6k2QTuiLerAKLB_hV1hkZNi4MLNqKU7MtVnMhMfPQw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPrugNr9wN63ANjTYzyrHRegr9KTk_OSTLfrt%2BhktCnfKX=_mg@mail.gmail.com> <20180824215302.ivfna55jtrtc5trg@freebsd480.station> <CAPrugNqV6k2QTuiLerAKLB_hV1hkZNi4MLNqKU7MtVnMhMfPQw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Isn't Intel supposed to be working on a native drm driver for FreeBSD?

https://bwidawsk.net/blog/index.php/2018/06/i965-compiler-architecture-from=
-2015/

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 14:53 Ali <aliovx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 06:54:54PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote:
>> > Just in case anyone misses the change to UPDATING:
>> >
>> > 20180821:
>> >         drm and drm2 have been removed. Users on powerpc, 32-bit
>> hardware,
>> >         or with GPUs predating Radeon and i915 will need to install th=
e
>> >         graphics/drm-legacy-kmod. All other users should be able to us=
e
>> >         one of the LinuxKPI-based ports: graphics/drm-stable-kmod,
>> >         graphics/drm-next-kmod, graphics/drm-devel-kmod.
>> > Note that this applies only to 12.
>>
>> I see that The removal of drm and drm2 has been reverted on svn. Could
>> you please kindly share the reasons behind the re-inclusion?
>>
>
>
> I can=E2=80=99t really give the blow by blow of internal project drama, b=
ut the
> gist of it is that =E2=80=9Cbest practices=E2=80=9D (which are not yet ac=
tually documented
> anywhere that I=E2=80=99ve seen) were not followed with regards to the de=
precation
> process. Warner and others believe that we can address the objectives of
> the drm removal (improving the user experience and communicating that
> drm/drm2 are _completely_ unsupported apart from continuing to compile)
> through less disruptive means. I am only acting as a lightning rod and
> representative of the graphics team and so have done an inadequate job of
> tracking their activities with respect to project timelines. As a result =
of
> this misunderstanding Johannes Lundberg will be sponsored for a bit and
> will be able to be involved in internal discussions that impact his work.
>
> Our only continued frustration is that we were never given any guidance b=
y
> RE or core on said =E2=80=9Cbest practices=E2=80=9D when the discussion w=
as taking place in
> May and then those groups behaved as if this were a surprise when the
> removal happened. I=E2=80=99m cautiously optimistic that this well expedi=
te
> improving communications on those matters.
>
>
> Cheers.
> -M
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO3OKx8-bWfdQU1XRxai6uK%2BpyfG3jD5SkSW9Yu_FK8LySuPOw>