Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:55:50 +0200 From: "Vlad GALU" <dudu@dudu.ro> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, jfvogel@gmail.com Subject: Re: two NIC on 2 core system (scheduling problem) Message-ID: <ad79ad6b0810280355w25005d0bs5188a004da11bf50@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4906EC8D.7070503@freebsd.org> References: <200810281235.53508.gizmen@blurp.pl> <4906EC8D.7070503@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > Bartosz Giza wrote: > >> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is >> actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about >> half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ? >> Could someone tell my why is this happening ? BGE is faster ? or maybe i can >> tune some > > I have the same problem - em0 taskq eating incredible amounts of CPU. If > you find a solution, contact me! > > > Could this be related to the different interrupt handling models? em(4) uses FILTER, the others use ITHREAD. -- ~/.signature: no such file or directory
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ad79ad6b0810280355w25005d0bs5188a004da11bf50>