From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 08:23:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A65116A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC6A43D2F for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:23:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 40933 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2004 15:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.47]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Apr 2004 15:23:16 -0000 Message-ID: <408934E3.1010901@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:23:15 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org References: <408929D7.1030406@freebsd.org> <40892BDB.9030500@freebsd.org> <20040423151442.GB49454@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040423151442.GB49454@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Subject: Re: Heads up: You may need recompile of ipfw(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:23:18 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:44:43PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >>Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: >> >>>Andre Oppermann writes: >>> >>> >>>> Due to a new option in ipfw (versrcreach) the ipfw(8) command >>>> needs to be recompiled. Normal accept/reject rules without >>>> options are not affected but those with options may break until >>>> ipfw(8) is recompiled. >>> >>> >>>any chance of renaming this to something less tongue-twisting, like >>>maybe "reachable"? >> >>I wanted it to stay in line with the other option "verrevpath" and the >>Cisco equivalent: >> >> ipfw add 1000 deny ip from any to any not versrcreach > > > How about adding an alias of something easily spellable then? This option is not for joe-user or joe-server-admin but for a couple of dozen people using FreeBSD as router with BGP. I trust them to be able to cope with this burden of spelling hardship. ;-) If it were an option for the general public I would have chosen something less complicated. -- Andre