From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 27 19:29:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA13307 for current-outgoing; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 19:29:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA13296 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 19:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id NAA06430; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 13:58:16 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199701280328.NAA06430@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: gdb-4.16 missing package files In-Reply-To: <199701242255.XAA11230@ocean.campus.luth.se> from Mikael Karpberg at "Jan 24, 97 11:55:02 pm" To: karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se (Mikael Karpberg) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 13:58:15 +1030 (CST) Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mikael Karpberg stands accused of saying: > > > > NO_PACKAGE= "This is for developers, thank you" > > Hmm... That seems pretty silly, no? Not at all in context. > I suppose this is meant like "develeopers should know how to build > stuff". I think "developers know how to build stuff, but why have > to take the hazzle"? Is there's no other reason for not having a > packet, why exclude it? It originally meant "We (pst & co.) use this in-house. It works for us, but no guarantees". Then later it meant "I (pst) am too busy to do anything with this, sorry. I'm trying to get 4.16 into the main tree." > /Mikael -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[