Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:08:59 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: lev@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? Message-ID: <ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org> References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: lev@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Message-ID: <ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org> --VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >=20 >>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- mo= st >>> important for me. (store-state)? >>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less importa= nt >>> for me. >> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a sever= al >> days. > Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really. This one https://people.freebsd.org/~ae/ipfw.diff but with separate opcodes, I have come to the opinion, that this will be more readable. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje-- --UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEsBAEBCAAWBQJXokFLDxxhZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRABxeoEEMihepldB/wJ UZVuTP/TSdpYsYbcxEi2j6oMYl2muRYNvcHF+iYy6xSs368NP1UgNl41L/qS7h24 BlEPQciXgZnOTD8biZCOLoNchJFN7RZJNT4cOzPg/XV46Vt9mykrapyuS8ELe29l icsKQUGYmiJZEWK6H4XdFpNqZ+ohRId6NzLMFqRTNdaPs9mNE9hS6jsNWPd3iKam tShEcS/BjspHov7Dm7r6uu01fQ8OZKJ1uN/NBu7uE1lwFTug7E9pzlKvTFt89bP4 pA4AQCB9xhluuVS//hVPg3CjbOUbADS+38FILH+31KoXudWuDVm3t0i3Vti0HcJH fs0T8YTWgmQBNoTX6pZ2 =wykh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51>