Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:08:59 +0300
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>
To:        lev@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?
Message-ID:  <ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje"
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>
To: lev@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>,
 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?
References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org>
 <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org>
 <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org>
 <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org>
 <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org>
 <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>
 <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org>

--VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>=20
>>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- mo=
st
>>> important for me. (store-state)?
>>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less importa=
nt
>>> for me.
>> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a sever=
al
>> days.
>  Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really.

This one
https://people.freebsd.org/~ae/ipfw.diff

but with separate opcodes, I  have come to the opinion, that this will
be more readable.

--=20
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov


--VNvXmvXE7E6u12EIfunCCiIsDHOQL0wje--

--UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEsBAEBCAAWBQJXokFLDxxhZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRABxeoEEMihepldB/wJ
UZVuTP/TSdpYsYbcxEi2j6oMYl2muRYNvcHF+iYy6xSs368NP1UgNl41L/qS7h24
BlEPQciXgZnOTD8biZCOLoNchJFN7RZJNT4cOzPg/XV46Vt9mykrapyuS8ELe29l
icsKQUGYmiJZEWK6H4XdFpNqZ+ohRId6NzLMFqRTNdaPs9mNE9hS6jsNWPd3iKam
tShEcS/BjspHov7Dm7r6uu01fQ8OZKJ1uN/NBu7uE1lwFTug7E9pzlKvTFt89bP4
pA4AQCB9xhluuVS//hVPg3CjbOUbADS+38FILH+31KoXudWuDVm3t0i3Vti0HcJH
fs0T8YTWgmQBNoTX6pZ2
=wykh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UGKoLmUajKWthBrcgnt4opFJmdxf2rN1a--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ee745842-c33e-4e73-f84c-6eb11f283b51>