From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 13:41:56 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA17767 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:41:56 -0700 Received: from ess.harris.com (su15a.ess.harris.com [130.41.1.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA17756 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:41:50 -0700 Received: from borg.ess.harris.com (suw2k.ess.harris.com) by ess.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA24834; Tue, 18 Apr 95 16:41:45 EDT Received: by borg.ess.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06053; Tue, 18 Apr 95 16:39:39 EDT Date: Tue, 18 Apr 95 16:39:39 EDT From: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com (James Leppek) Message-Id: <9504182039.AA06053@borg.ess.harris.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: invalid IPs Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ok what does this mean? that something should respond to a ping or not? I thought the reason these numbers were reserved was that everyone(routers) were supposed to ignore them if they ever appeared on the internet. So if I do traceroute and someone in the 204.157 domain is responding does that mean something is a miss? or that they were given the numbers... I have been telling folks to use those reserved numbers for their private networks because they should/would never appear on the net. I guess I was wrong :-( Oh well, lost count of my mistakes long ago :-) Jim Leppek > From owner-freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com Tue Apr 18 16:23:36 1995 > From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) > Subject: Re: PPP and dynamic IPs drifting a little > To: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com (James Leppek) > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:53:49 MDT > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] > Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org > > > Speaking of IP's I was responding to this mail and recalled > > the words of wisdom in the /etc/hosts file about selecting > > private IPs from a set of reserved numbers that are never > > to appear on the net and getting valid numbers if > > you are on the net. It had mentioned 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255 > > as reserved. > > > > Well, I tried to ping those to confirm they are never in use and > > I got an answer! Then I tried 192.168.1.2 and it answered!! > > > > So what is the scoop on those numbers and RFC1597? > > [rs0.internic.net] > IANA (IANA-CBLK-RESERVED) > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority > Information Sciences Institute > University of Southern California > 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 > Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695 > > Netname: IANA-CBLK1 > Netblock: 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.0 > > Coordinator: > Reynolds, Joyce K. (JKR1) JKRey@ISI.EDU > (310) 822-1511 > > Domain System inverse mapping provided by: > > NS.ISI.EDU 128.9.128.127 > DNS.MERIT.NET 35.1.1.42 > > Record last updated on 01-Nov-94. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@cs.weber.edu > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >