From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jun  6 13:07:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA01722
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA01656;
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA22954
          ; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:06:42 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA26725; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:03:29 -0600
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:03:29 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606062003.OAA26725@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: miscfs/devfs
In-Reply-To: <27520.834089668@palmer.demon.co.uk>
References: <27520.834089668@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Is devfs meant to have been tagged onto the 2.1 branch? I just noticed
> that it appeared in my checkout on freefall and the tags are there for
> both 2.0.5 and 2.1! Umm?!?

That's because it existed in both 2.0.5 and 2.1 stable.


Nate