Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 23:11:44 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@freebsd-services.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed patch to log_accum.pl Message-ID: <p0510100fb7c72201b2b8@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20010914033942.M29860@tao.org.uk> References: <joe@tao.org.uk> <200109140151.f8E1prd00702@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20010914025459.E29860@tao.org.uk> <p0510100db7c71a45e2a7@[128.113.24.47]> <20010914033942.M29860@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 3:39 AM +0100 9/14/01, Josef Karthauser wrote: >On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:32:00PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >> I'd want the same number of columns under "Changes" for those people >> who parse this by splitting on blanks. And there was some reason I >> needed an explicit indication of "new" and "removed" files. (I want >> this for a 'cvsmerge' perl script that I've been working on). Hmm, >> actually I can tell "new" because the revision number will be 1.1, >> but it still looks nice to have that '(new)' on the line... > >It won't necessarily be 1.1. Consider a file that's been removed, and >then revived with a 'cvs add' at a later stage. Ooo, I hadn't thought of that. Good point! Well then, I'd definitely like some kind of explicit marker there! Again, thanks for looking into this! -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0510100fb7c72201b2b8>