From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 9 13:00:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B9106566C for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BAC8FC08 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p69D0Q3F003830 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p69D0Q0x003829; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:00:26 GMT Message-Id: <201107091300.p69D0Q0x003829@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Timothy Beyer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/154546: update port: games/gemrb to version 0.6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Timothy Beyer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:00:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/154546; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Timothy Beyer To: Chris Rees , Martin Wilke Cc: beyert@cs.ucr.edu, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/154546: update port: games/gemrb to version 0.6.3 Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 05:37:32 -0700 At Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:13:59 +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > > Hi, > > Did you see Martin Wilke's followup? > > If you'd like to revise your patch and send it to > bug-followup@FreeBSD.org with this subject line a committer will take > care of it. > > Chris > Hi, I apologize for the delays and lack of communication on this PR. Immediately after corresponding with Martin, I completed updating the port in March to 0.6.3, but at that point, 0.6.4 was newly released, and I decided to just update to 0.6.4 instead. So, what I'd like to is just update to 0.6.4. Should I open a new PR when that is ready, or can I just use this existing PR? Either solution is acceptable to me, but I think that users would prefer the newest version, since it contains numerous improvements. Regards, Tim