Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Sep 2001 07:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/30380: Maintainer update: devel/gengetopt (2.4)
Message-ID:  <200109071450.f87Eo3u79115@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/30380; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/30380: Maintainer update: devel/gengetopt (2.4)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:42:12 +0300

 On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
 > Peter Pentchev wrote:
 > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:40:03AM -0700, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
 > > > The following reply was made to PR ports/30380; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > > > 
 > > > From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
 > > > 
 > > >  could you also add the following line below USE_GMAKE,
 > > >  
 > > >  MAKE_ARGS=      prefix=${PREFIX}
 > > 
 > > Does this really need to be in MAKE_ARGS?  Does it not rather belong
 > > in MAKE_ENV?
 > 
 > no, using gmake, this doesn't work using MAKE_ENV. MAKE_ARGS does.
 > 
 > in fact, this hack allow you to build things for one destination and
 > to install them somewhere else (for installation tests for exemple).
 > I'll propose to make USE_GMAKE a dependency of GNU_CONFIGURE as well
 > as MAKE_ARGS+= prefix=${PREFIX} to make things working better...
 
 OK, how about my other question: doesn't GNU_CONFIGURE handle
 PREFIX correctly?
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 
 -- 
 Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109071450.f87Eo3u79115>