Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:14:12 -0700 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port register/unregister hogs up resources and takes forever Message-ID: <200509270114.13395.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200509262322.40104@aldan> References: <200509261700.48416.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200509261558.13760.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200509262322.40104@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 26 September 2005 20:22, you wrote: > On Monday 26 September 2005 06:58 pm, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > = Just to let you know, I tested your patch with sysutils/portmanager by > = deleting a random few dependencies of gnome2 then running "portmanager > = -u" to see if they would be found and reinstalled. Portmanager makes > = extensive use of "make all-depends-list" to find missing ports and the > = test passed with your changes. > > Thanks for confirmation. > > = Keep in mind though, it also works fine with the original bsd.port.mk. > > The original not only uses A LOT more resources for each run (spawning > dozens of make processes), it also misses some dependencies. For > example, print/teTeX will often be missed, because print/teTeX-base > will already be on the list... > > -mi Ahh, you said that in the PR but I didn't "get it" at first, didn't read carefully enough I guess. Maybe for idiots like me you can spell it out even more clearly? For example, when * * * print/teTeX-base ..... is in the list then print/teTeX ...... will be missed * * * -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509270114.13395.ringworm01>