Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:22:46 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel Makefile distinfo ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/files Makefile.localized oo_setup.resp openoffice-wrapper Message-ID: <20040614012246.GA76490@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040614.094741.846949078.chat95@mac.com> References: <200406132357.i5DNv1bm097739@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040614001431.GA75296@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040614.094741.846949078.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:47:41AM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <20040614001431.GA75296@xor.obsecurity.org>=20 > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > Thank you very much for your feedback! >=20 > > Have they finally fixed localized builds so they don't compile the > > entire OO package suite? This is a major headache for package > > building since >=20 > This is also my concern. For localized builds, we can build all > the localized version at one time, just adding ALL in configure_args. > however current situation of ports framework, it is quite difficult. > > > * The OpenOffice 1.1 builds are not deterministic; they often fail > > with internal errors in random places. >=20 > Hmmm...I haven't encounter such situation for FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE. > I restrict supported environment to FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE > so that others can build smoothly. is it better for us to > restrict FreeBSD version? or does it occur > even for FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE? I don't know since I only build packages against the head of the branches. I've forwarded some of the logs to openoffice@ over the past few months, though. > > > 4) make use of ccache > >=20 > > Is this a help within one build, or only useful for repeated builds. > > I'm concerned it will have a significant space impact on package > > builds without benefit. >=20 > It doesn't help for one build. ONLY useful for repeated builds. OK, I think it should be disabled for the PARALLEL_PACKAGE_BUILD case. Kris --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAzP3mWry0BWjoQKURAnLDAKDqimlHC5CbeotRJaXuj+SIfWfLLACfaTx5 0TrhZTLFUAuTpCmAUfglP1M= =2tNW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614012246.GA76490>