From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 17 5:15:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3191637B717 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 05:15:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F827CB20; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:15:17 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:14:52 +0100 To: Stephen Roome From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates... Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:01 PM +0000 2000/2/17, Stephen Roome wrote: > Although these figures are good for a comparison with a >pre-softupdates FreeBSD > or say, Linux ext2/ext3 (does ext3 it exist yet?), it would be nice to have > similar sort of benchmarks to compare with say, HPUX lvm, Solaris, or > comparisons between FreeBSD+vinum+softupdates and Whatever+Veritas etc. Yeah, on a broader scale, that would be nice. But I don't have all that kind of hardware, and I don't have the time to do all that much benchmarking. I was primarily looking at what kind of performance hit you take when you get lots of synchronous meta-data updates, and what kind of performance improvement you might theoretically be able to see if you could re-architect your application so as to avoid synchronous meta-data operations whenever possible. That said, I'm willing to collect and centralize benchmarks run on a variety of platforms, but you'll have to use the script I provide to generate the data, and you'll have to give me details about the hardware configuration. If you've made any kernel changes or performance tweaks, you'll need to let me know about those, too. I'll be updating my page at with the new information, and details about what requirements have to be satisfied before I will accept benchmark data from others to be incorporated on the page. -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message