Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:42:51 GMT
From:      "hyperion" <grfgguvf@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   ports/129749: Upgrading of packages
Message-ID:  <200812190342.mBJ3gpVc028936@www.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <200812190350.mBJ3o1gu046019@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         129749
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Upgrading of packages
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Dec 19 03:50:01 UTC 2008
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     "hyperion"
>Release:        7.1-RC1
>Organization:
lacking
>Environment:
7.1-RC1
>Description:
There should be a way in the base system to upgrade packages. pkg_add refuses to replace an installed package with a newer version. With the -fF option (the need to use -f with -F is undocumented), I end up with both the old and the new version installed. Portmanager and portmaster don't seem to support use of binary packages. Portupgrade doesn't understand PACKAGESITE which pkg_add does (it thinks : separates directories, so specifying an ftp:// site is impossible).

The other BSDs have an -u option of pkg_add which could be considered. The need to manually set a PACKAGESITE should be eliminated.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812190342.mBJ3gpVc028936>