Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 May 2001 13:23:44 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: Patch to eliminate struct pcred
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010509132233.11741w-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010509092108.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 9 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote:

> Some comments:
> 
> @@ -274,21 +275,31 @@
> ...
> -           (p->p_flag & P_TRACED) == 0) {
> +           p->p_flag & P_TRACED) {
> ...
> 
> It looks like you've inverted the sense of that test.

Oops, nice catch.  I've now fixed that.

> What is the XXX: locking comment about here:
> 
> @@ -296,25 +307,50 @@
> +                       p->p_flag &= ~P_SUGID;  /* XXX locking */
>                 PROC_UNLOCK(p);
> 
> The process is locked when that flag is cleared.

This is from an earlier incarnation where I had the locking rearranged
some.  It no longer applies, so I've removed it.

A patch with those changes (only) is available at:

    http://www.watson.org/~robert/pcred.3.diff

Thanks again,

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
robert@fledge.watson.org      NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010509132233.11741w-100000>