From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 6 21:12:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA14950 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 21:12:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (tc-12.acadiau.ca [131.162.2.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA14934 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 21:12:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.2) with SMTP id BAA27285; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:11:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 01:11:31 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: "Michael R. Gile" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd 3.0 stability In-Reply-To: <4.0.1.19980706222225.01022100@mail.wsg.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Michael R. Gile wrote: > is anyone on this list running both 3.0-current and 2.2-stable, that > could perhaps give me a comparison? i am interested primarily in the > SMP capabilities, to use with other freebsd machines, rather than > running Linux, but would like some opinions on the stability of 3.0, > given the fact that 3.0-release probably wont be seen for some time. I'm running a *reasonably* current 3.0 on a production server, with CAM drivers...haven't noticed any problems that I can associate with the operating system... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message