Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 06:54:59 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/fetch fetch.1 Message-ID: <xzpy8rvuudo.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200401251909.45346.wes@softweyr.com> (Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:09:45 -0800") References: <200401230450.i0N4omSZ049990@repoman.freebsd.org> <40123A86.3040102@aueb.gr> <xzp1xppt08v.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200401251909.45346.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes: > Roger Wilco. Is it OK to make a stronger recommendation that the user=20 > consult fetch(3) for some rather critical information about how fetch(1)= =20 > really works? By all means! I just don't want any duplication. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy8rvuudo.fsf>