From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 1 15:39:39 2001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 1 15:39:37 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.k2access.net (mail.k2access.net [63.140.99.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D2F37B402 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 15:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mephisto ([208.41.204.124]) by mail.k2access.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59171U1000L100S0V35) with SMTP id net for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:38:53 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Eric D. Stanfield" To: Subject: half-life port Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:39:24 -0600 Message-ID: <000901c0744c$128c6060$7ccc29d0@thestanfields.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know there's a half-life port with counterstrike out but it requires linux emulation to be loaded. I'm just curious as to what effect having to run this under emulation has on system requirements and performance versus a native port of the hl server and if there is anyone working on a native *bsd port. Eric To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message