From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 10 14:24:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C026106564A; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE98FC17; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so3487643pxi.13 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zt0CeQjsSrsqiSUjA247MbhV2HeuqtL0ngw1pVAsu+s=; b=vu//QYl0oW+02sefvRSGRwxGRarojRmFMXQMpTpmUNoIqTE4DcJ1mHMC04wx+lCzq5 LF/YPXmLYqhwN/XTaBkoBNyey1N9qC+vv7EhGmwlXNIoaYJugZdLMMVw+NvBmPcJ0h+w 9tRN+sIY8zVKhMG7B3+YgWZJDmpFp/ycwixp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XtEHoqUX3nNxFPkhJAj+hfSDt2tOpVFuilaY0wpHVLL+PAy7TUtQh81xVzVStPwoxU raABdZFnLEh+nkSOlqfnKxD13pehJDcN2LhrTKC6sV5RlpiEz5vznQjHqirjMYOz6iV+ 84AsQ7CH/1cuVXCga+ow2uSZyGqReqp8DC82Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.187.18 with SMTP id k18mr211719waf.101.1276179890997; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.174.14 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:24:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:24:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Sack To: Juli Mallett Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:24:52 -0000 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Juli Mallett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:56, Alexander Sack wrote: >> $ ifconfig ix1 >> ix1: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > You need to bring the interface up in order for the SFP configuration to occur. I am little bit confused: What's different with the ixgbe(4) than em(4)? i.e. My second em(4) interface auto-negotiates properly on boot up, why shouldn't ixgbe without having to do an additional ifconfig down/up cycle? (my ifconfig output above might be a little off since I was debugging my SFP issues). -aps