From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 10:26:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF9B16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DDF43D5A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:26:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 22E671C000AB for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 023A61C00099 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:13 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050322102614925.023A61C00099@mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:13 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1404322406.20050322112613@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <423E116D.50805@usmstudent.com> <423EEE60.2050205@dial.pipex.com> <18510151385.20050321193911@wanadoo.fr> <1975192207.20050322041925@wanadoo.fr> <1688160068.20050322102514@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:26:15 -0000 Freminlins writes: > So stick with NT. Why would you change from something that runs > perfectly for 8 years? I was able to retire the legacy applications on the machine and I wanted to try something new. > That doesn't mean nothing has changed in 20 years, does it? It means that the age of the OS is not an issue. > And your hardware seems to not work very well with FreeBSD. Move on. No, FreeBSD doesn't work very well with the hardware. As a matter of fact, it doesn't work very well with the hardware on my production server, either. It seems that as soon as you install FreeBSD on a machine, the "hardware" fails. > That's not what has been said. Having read this thread (and others by > you previously) you have no intention of helping yourself. What would you suggest that I do? It takes a very long time to wade through OS source code. -- Anthony