From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 4 16:31:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FF137B403 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA54514; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 01:31:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Peter Wemm Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing ptrace(2)'s dependency on procfs(5) References: <20011004230154.4A0D63809@overcee.netplex.com.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 05 Oct 2001 01:31:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Yep - at some point the functions should be renamed, and the > prototypes should probably go into instead of the bogus > I added. I've put up a new patch that places the prototypes in ptrace.h rather than add a new header: http://people.freebsd.org/~des/software/ptrace-20011005.diff DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message