Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:59:07 +0200
From:      Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [ZFS] Using SSD with partitions
Message-ID:  <4E9D5BFB.5060609@my.gd>
In-Reply-To: <CACh33FpgTUEqsaTuSSOmRsGgk24K4%2BFuL90Zu-3v3F%2BRRtaOHw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CACh33Fpz=uAp8h0Bjsi1Be=ob_94jXtN51mAHvGPkReY5MpTcg@mail.gmail.com> <4E9AE725.4040001@gmail.com> <CACh33FpgTUEqsaTuSSOmRsGgk24K4%2BFuL90Zu-3v3F%2BRRtaOHw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 10/18/11 5:53 AM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> Since people have asked about more details for my system:
> 
> It uses old desktop hardware with 5 1TB WD Caviar Blues in a raidz
> configuration with 1 of those drives being a hot spare (4 1TB drives
> in the raidz). The system currently has 2 GB of RAM IIRC.
> 
> I've been using NFS to access the data on my home network which has
> worked pretty well. Writing to NFS over my VPN from across the country
> is really bad which is one of the reasons I wanted to use a SSD for a
> ZIL. read/write performance overall tends to be bad though so I don't
> really know how much it will help. After fiddling around with NFS
> settings for a long time I soon gave up and instead use SSH when
> outside a LAN. That's another matter though and off-topic. :)
> 
> 

This is going to sound a bit rude, my preemptive apologies.

Just where did you get the notion that changing your bike's tires would
make your car run faster ?

In what world does your *storage* configuration affect your *network*
latency and performance ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9D5BFB.5060609>