Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:59:07 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ZFS] Using SSD with partitions Message-ID: <4E9D5BFB.5060609@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <CACh33FpgTUEqsaTuSSOmRsGgk24K4%2BFuL90Zu-3v3F%2BRRtaOHw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACh33Fpz=uAp8h0Bjsi1Be=ob_94jXtN51mAHvGPkReY5MpTcg@mail.gmail.com> <4E9AE725.4040001@gmail.com> <CACh33FpgTUEqsaTuSSOmRsGgk24K4%2BFuL90Zu-3v3F%2BRRtaOHw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/18/11 5:53 AM, Patrick Donnelly wrote: > Since people have asked about more details for my system: > > It uses old desktop hardware with 5 1TB WD Caviar Blues in a raidz > configuration with 1 of those drives being a hot spare (4 1TB drives > in the raidz). The system currently has 2 GB of RAM IIRC. > > I've been using NFS to access the data on my home network which has > worked pretty well. Writing to NFS over my VPN from across the country > is really bad which is one of the reasons I wanted to use a SSD for a > ZIL. read/write performance overall tends to be bad though so I don't > really know how much it will help. After fiddling around with NFS > settings for a long time I soon gave up and instead use SSH when > outside a LAN. That's another matter though and off-topic. :) > > This is going to sound a bit rude, my preemptive apologies. Just where did you get the notion that changing your bike's tires would make your car run faster ? In what world does your *storage* configuration affect your *network* latency and performance ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9D5BFB.5060609>