From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 24 08:23:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA24926 for current-outgoing; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (root@agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA24891 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com by agora.rdrop.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #17) id m0v5ZKU-0008z0C; Tue, 24 Sep 96 08:23 PDT Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA06843; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 09:12:11 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 09:12:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199609241512.JAA06843@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: Warner Losh Cc: Bruce Evans , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199609241441.IAA05913@rover.village.org> References: <199609230506.PAA05354@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199609241441.IAA05913@rover.village.org> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I'd still like to merge in the -d code from NetBSD/OpenBSD. ... > I've seen it in a few other makefiles floating around on the net. I'm > not advocating that we use it for the 'make install' phase of the > build process, just that it be available. > > With that clarification, do people generally like or dislike the > proposal? Doesn't GNU-install support '-d'? If so, the functionality is already available. Nate