Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:22:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Peter Steele <psteele@webmail.maxiscale.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Is this a gmirror bug? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271921280.53599@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338DA@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com> References: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338D4@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262333080.48107@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><20090526230522.GH49013@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20090527011302.98954329.freebsd@edvax.de> <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338DA@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/mirror/gm0d 4058062 -377792 4111210 110% /tmp >> /dev/mirror/gm0e 15231278 -113942 14126718 101% /var >> >> then? I always assumed that a disk occupation > 100% would go into >> this reserved area, which would turn the Capacity field to be more >> than 100%, and not less than 0%? This is the case when I have more >> data on a UFS partition than it "is allowed to"... > > I've seen this before a few times, but never something less than 0%. > I've reimaged the system to correct it. Will have to see if it happens > again... did you checked that partitions with fsck? (fsck_ffs -y) does it detects errors and fix them? after fsck is it ok or still nonsense in Used?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271921280.53599>