From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 5 17:41:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D115116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from teeny2.aspadmin.com (teeny2.aspadmin.com [216.98.128.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7EB44005 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:41:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwilliams@courtesymortgage.com) Received: from jwilliams.courtesymortgage.com (CMC_pier_point [209.126.131.11] (may be forged)) by teeny2.aspadmin.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA61fFv09110 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:41:16 -0800 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com> X-Sender: jwilliams@pop.courtesymortgage.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:36:40 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jason Williams Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: FreeBSD 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 01:41:16 -0000 Just a quick question here. How stable is 5.1 for production servers? There are a lot of features I like offered in 5.1, but im not sure about the stability of it. Anyone care to comment on whether or not 5.1 is a good or bad idea for a production server? I appreciate it. Jason