Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:43:17 +0900 From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 route mutex recursion (crash) and fix Message-ID: <m21xgvxbui.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20040922020957.GE84424@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040922020957.GE84424@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:09:57 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > I've already made noise about this before, so I'll be brief. I plan on > committing the following fix that prevents the routing code from being > recursed upon such that RTM_RESOLVE causes the embryonic new route to > be looked up again. I realize that probably no one will bother trying > to see this bug in action, but all you need to do is send some UDP6 to > ff02::1%<if> as a user, with INVARIANTS turned on. > > Are there any objections? It would be nice to have this in 5-STABLE, > in case anyone actually wants to have IPv6. Unless I am missing something (I have not applied the patch) it's not doing anything. What does the new code actually do? I'll try to try this patch out later. Later, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m21xgvxbui.wl>