Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:28:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Heads up: You may need recompile of ipfw(8) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404231026420.6894-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20040423151442.GB49454@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:44:43PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > >Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> writes: > > > > > >> Due to a new option in ipfw (versrcreach) the ipfw(8) command > > >> needs to be recompiled. Normal accept/reject rules without > > >> options are not affected but those with options may break until > > >> ipfw(8) is recompiled. > > > > > > > > >any chance of renaming this to something less tongue-twisting, like > > >maybe "reachable"? > > > > I wanted it to stay in line with the other option "verrevpath" and the > > Cisco equivalent: > > > > ipfw add 1000 deny ip from any to any not versrcreach > > How about adding an alias of something easily spellable then? yeah what's a vers-screach? (how my visual processing center interprets it :-) sounds nasty.. > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0404231026420.6894-100000>