From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Apr 13 02:45:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA17078 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:45:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA17073 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:45:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA03678; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804130945.CAA03678@implode.root.com> To: Andrew Perry cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New name? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Apr 1998 19:35:32 +1000." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:45:03 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > >On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >> > >> >Other names that were mentioned are "BSD Gold" and "BSD 2000". >> >> All of these would violate BSDI's trademark. I think I can say with some >> certainty that we will never change the name away from FreeBSD. >> > >Would it be possible to retain the name FreeBSD (which I wouldn't like to >change anyway) and sell a product labelled as BSD Gold, BSD Pro etc... in >addition to the FreeBSD 2.2.6 currently sold? ...it would still violate the trademark. A product name like FreeBSD/Pro is definately not a problem, and is even (extremely) likely, in fact. :-) -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message