Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:45:23 -0600 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: Jason Williams <jwilliams@courtesymortgage.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 Message-ID: <200311051945.23589.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 07:36 pm, Jason Williams wrote: > Just a quick question here. > > How stable is 5.1 for production servers? There are a lot of features I > like offered in 5.1, but im not sure about the stability of it. > Anyone care to comment on whether or not 5.1 is a good or bad idea for a > production server? Well - prolly not a good idea for production however, if you MUST use the 5.x line, 5.1 is far stabeler (is that a woid?) the it's previous release of 5.0 > > I appreciate it. > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards, Chris ______________________________________________________________________ PGP Fingerprint = D976 2575 D0B4 E4B0 45CC AA09 0F93 FF80 C01B C363 PGP Mail encouraged / preferred - keys available on common key servers ______________________________________________________________________ 01010010011000010110001101100101011100100101100000000000
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311051945.23589.racerx>