Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:45:23 -0600
From:      Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
To:        Jason Williams <jwilliams@courtesymortgage.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 5.1
Message-ID:  <200311051945.23589.racerx@makeworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com>
References:  <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 07:36 pm, Jason Williams wrote:
> Just a quick question here.
>
> How stable is 5.1 for production servers? There are a lot of features I
> like offered in 5.1, but im not sure about the stability of it.
> Anyone care to comment on whether or not 5.1 is a good or bad idea for a
> production server?

Well - prolly not a good idea for production however, if you MUST use the 5.x 
line, 5.1 is far stabeler (is that a woid?) the it's previous release of 5.0

>
> I appreciate it.
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 

Best regards,
                 Chris
______________________________________________________________________

PGP Fingerprint = D976 2575 D0B4 E4B0 45CC AA09 0F93 FF80 C01B C363

PGP Mail encouraged / preferred - keys available on common key servers
______________________________________________________________________
       01010010011000010110001101100101011100100101100000000000




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311051945.23589.racerx>