Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:41:59 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: Buki <dev@null.cz>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade weirdness Message-ID: <200303310841.59224.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <20030331163232.GA6705@dak2060.sh.cvut.cz> References: <20030331163232.GA6705@dak2060.sh.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 31 March 2003 08:32 am, Buki wrote: > Hi, > > I am begining to think there is something wrong with portutils > (notice the difference between pkg_version and portversion): > > buki@dak2060:/usr/ports#portversion -v | grep -v = > XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 < needs updating (port has 4.3.0_1) > cvsup-without-gui-16.1f < needs updating (port has 16.1g) > ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3 < needs updating (port has 7.05_4) > portupgrade-20030308_2 > succeeds port (port has 20030228) > > buki@dak2060:/usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep -v = > XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 < needs updating (port has > 4.3.0_1) cvsup-without-gui-16.1f < needs updating (port > has 16.1g) fontconfig-2.1_6 < needs updating > (port has 2.1_7) ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3 < needs > updating (port has 7.05_5) lftp-2.6.4 < > needs updating (port has 2.6.5) mutt-devel-1.5.3 < > needs updating (port has 1.5.4) net-snmp-5.0.6 > < needs updating (port has 5.0.8) w3m-0.4 > < needs updating (port has 0.4.1) > > buki@dak2060:/home/buki>uname -a > FreeBSD dak2060.xx.xx.cz 5.0-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 #4: > Mon Mar 31 10:56:15 CEST 2003 > buki@dak2060.xx.xx.cz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DAK2060 i386 > > ports cvsup-ed today an hour ago > Did you "portsdb -uU" to upgrade your INDEX files? This is the kind of thing that a mismatched INDEX and INDEX.dv would produce. Kent > also, I am getting some 'Checksum mismatch' errors, namely with w3m, > lftp. > > Buki -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303310841.59224.kstewart>