Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:20:13 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Anders Nordby <anders@FreeBSD.org>, ijliao@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Security Officer Team <security-officer@FreeBSD.org>, dominic_marks@btinternet.com, Yonatan Bokovza <Yonatan@xpert.com> Subject: Re: PR/38716 fragroute Message-ID: <20020530192013.GA14779@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <20020530191217.GC78332@totem.fix.no> References: <20020530160432.GA13362@madman.nectar.cc> <20020530161148.GA13507@madman.nectar.cc> <20020530191217.GC78332@totem.fix.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:12:17PM +0200, Anders Nordby wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:11:48AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > Well, actually I _don't_ have the 65edbfc51f8070517f14ceeb8f721075 > > tarball. Sorry. > > You can get it from > ftp://ftp.nuug.no/pub/anders/distfiles/fragroute-1.2.tar.gz. > > > The configure script of the 7e4de763fae35a50e871bdcd1ac8e23a tarball > > does pass visual inspection, but I caution that at this point we've > > received conflicting reports about which is OK and which is not. > > Attached is a diff between the two. > > Cheers, > Thanks, much, Anders! That's the code I was watching for in configure (same as was used in irssi). I wasn't sure whether this instance took the same approach or not ... Now that we know, I think it is safe to let it go. I will remove FORBIDDEN from the port (the checksum has already been updated). Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020530192013.GA14779>