From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 16:28:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5DF16A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F87843D1D for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so529044rns for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:28:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kWUpqWBM2VTJAxeLGnSN8YbyGO5Lp2Q8/fsbk3lhseLzrjAdITP0kWYR9ZjhOKEVIW4Fk/AKXm8spMmBIr5EveU9Y3/7kVGbnBjKx+djFq1tW7HMfcjjryZ3wWtXPp1W5swTxGyaDn1PFEiXB4LMatSW30Mnsg9NvbkvcWSbWps= Received: by 10.38.179.2 with SMTP id b2mr189667rnf; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.179.65 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:28:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:28:09 +0000 From: Phil Brennan To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: performance under heavy load X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Phil Brennan List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:28:10 -0000 Hi, I'd just like to give some credit to the freebsd developers for a job well done. A user on our system ( freebsd 5.2.1 smp ) managed with a runaway script to start up 500 intensive processes, raising the load average to about 200. We managed to remotely, over ssh get a somewhat responsive session and kill the offending processes. Yes, I know we shouldn't have let it happen in the first place, by putting in proper user limits and all that, but it was amazing that the machine still worked. We thought we'd have to reboot. Even with a load of nearly 200, the machine was still able to serve web pages :) Once the load came down past 60, the system feltl fully responsive again. On linux, we would have had to reboot in this situation. On a highly linux machine, you lose all control of the machine past a load of about 6 - 10. This just further vindicates my decision to use freebsd for this service. ( Its a shell server with about 100 active users, apache, nfs, mysql, ldap ). Just wanted to share a success story :) Regards, Philip Brennan