Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:36:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1104152023390.20825@freddy.simplesystems.org> In-Reply-To: <1924310048.124584.1302915420741.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1924310048.124584.1302915420741.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> My intent here is not to sound overly critical, but critical enough to >> make sure you triple-check all your ducks are in a row. :-) > > Well, I can't think of more that I can do than answer, as above. It is my feeling that you have been unnecessarily slammed. I have not tried the experimental NFS but then again I am not running the latest FreeBSD either. When I do update my FreeBSD, I will be sure to use your experimental version. My main interest is interoperability with systems other than FreeBSD such as Solaris, Linux, and Apple's OS X. Client throughput of FreeBSD's default NFS is low. I would be hoping to get more throughput. Also, modern NFS uses TCP so I would expect to use that. I am also using the automounter and hope that the updated NFS works at least as well (or better) than the default one. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.01.1104152023390.20825>