Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 09:21:11 +0200 From: Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended arm hardware (mostly for compilation)? Message-ID: <f7a88252-fa01-69a1-d442-747d69541d89@spth.de> In-Reply-To: <EXbrttrQC0_YXokurrTuHT6YcY3XC0JhXIkklq6vP6OmhlDw2DSXWz8B3_e_9kDFZowErA8gjjvQrAe4w5t4M8J1Fmfb-ev4uIgI9r7wW4w=@a9development.com> References: <1b109252-3232-05c4-e1e0-2fea4739583d@spth.de> <47A5AF8A-1EB9-4721-94D5-B0A0A6FFF69B@unrelenting.technology> <9E10C464-474F-489A-A667-B263A64E78F2@googlemail.com> <EXbrttrQC0_YXokurrTuHT6YcY3XC0JhXIkklq6vP6OmhlDw2DSXWz8B3_e_9kDFZowErA8gjjvQrAe4w5t4M8J1Fmfb-ev4uIgI9r7wW4w=@a9development.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 14.05.20 um 17:30 schrieb Dan Kotowski: > I have a SolidRun HoneyComb workstation board based on the LX2K and > can confirm it's quite powerful, however I have only been able to get > Linux-based systems running - I have not been able to get FreeBSD > working, but am working on it. SolidRun provides all the sources > necessary to do so, it's just a matter of interpreting all the > documentation. Do you have any experience of how this board performs vs the MACCHIATObin? Both have A72 cores at 2 Ghz. The LX2K has 16 cores vs 4 cores on the MACCHIATObin, but I wonder if typical compilation workloads are able to use all cores vs. being I/O or memory-bandwidth-starved. The other main advantage of the LX2K would be dual-channel memory. But I wonder if that worth the price difference. Philipp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f7a88252-fa01-69a1-d442-747d69541d89>